What the heck does 10% RH for the air in the AMS container mean in terms of filament dryness? My guts scream at me that the fillament shouldn't really be a lot different than dessicant is. Desicants and fillaments are not a gas so gas laws don't apply. Has anyone looked at this? How does fillament humidity relate to air relative humidity?
I think this could be a fantastic discussion. Anybody have any knowledge on the subject?
You're speaking my language.
The translation between the air's relative humidity & a material's (3D printing filaments, or building materials such as wood & concrete) moisture content is defined by its sorption isotherm at a specific temperature.
To make this relatable, think of an Isotherm chart as a water tank level indicator...
To visualize this, think of two connected water tanks, Air Tank A, the AMS chamber interior, which is relationally tiny compared to the storage volume of the second tank, Filament Tank B which is actually much larger and holding the bulk of the water.
The catch, and where temperature comes in, is like a variable speed pump connecting the two tanks. At room temperature, the pump is throttled down to trickle (high vapour resistance). Water is being pumped from filament Tank B to air Tank A incredibly slowly.
To get water out of filament you need a vapour pressure gradient... a force to overcome the vapour resistance.
Temperature and relative humidity are the two conditions that we can manipulate to create a gradient, the greater the temperature, and/or the lower the rH the greater the vapour pressure created by the gradient... the variable speed pump increases to speed up the release of moisture from Tank B.
But now we have a problem. Air tank A is so small it fills up very quickly and the moisture transfers again slows to a trickle, because the chamber rH at the higher temperature has become saturated.
Now what? So we introduce a second pump... and third tank to transfer the moisture from Tank A to Tank C.
This is where many people will think "Oh yeah, that desiccant."
Nope.
Desiccant does have a completely different sorption isotherm profile than filament... and that does help keep filament dry, but not under the heated conditions. Under heating the desiccant too is dumping moisture into Air Tank A.
When you raise the temperature, you do two things, you change the scale on the air tank's level indicator, because warm air can hold drastically more vapor capacity,
Desiccant and filament are constantly pumping water into Tank A. If the two materials have too much moisture the chamber becomes saturated.
So we can see that a closed loop systems can backfire... because the desiccant in Tank C will also get hot. As a desiccant heats up, its ability to hold water plummets drastically.
Therefore, an open loop system is advisable. I'll still describe them like a closed loop, but of infinite capacity.... So Pump 2 and Tank C. The room environment.
Think of the old leaky, over ventilated home in the winter, with indoor air as dry as a desert. This is because humidity is relative. When freezing cold outdoor air leaks inside and gets heated up to room temperature, its capacity to hold water vapor expands exponentially. This instantly crashes its relative humidity down to near 0%, creating a powerful, natural moisture vacuum.
By utilizing an open loop venting the hot, moist air out and constantly bringing in fresh air to be heated you create that same ultra dry "winter home" environment inside the chamber, maximizing the vapor pressure gradient without ever needing a desiccant.
BUT
You are not always printing and heating your filament... so you need desiccant for when you're not heating and just storing filament between print jobs... and that means you need operable modifiable ventilation.
Vents that open and close...