This one?... The QIDI Pro 4 wasn't on your radar?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3b83/b3b83aa696754e3180bdffbb8a9ccce537ace7e9" alt="qidi3d.com"
QIDI Plus4 3D Printer
Masterful printing with full-auto calibration, upgraded toolhead, vast build space, and consistent 65℃ chamber heating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0493d/0493dfe0dce7e3e0141d0cffd8a1c7131bb1f4a7" alt="qidi3d.com"
This one?... The QIDI Pro 4 wasn't on your radar?
I don't expect to be a power user here and haven't had a chance to touch my A1 yet, but is the native software pretty bad for basic users like me? Is everyone using Orca Slicer?
I don't really think I'll be using any remote monitoring and can just set it up to run on LAN if need be.
I'm 100% against this move by Bambu but just want to understand what the native workflow with Bambu is like for basic users.
I still remember when Apple dropped MusicMatch and introduced ITunes some 20 years ago. I stopped buying iPods since, both because I didn't enjoy ITunes and the idea of a closed ecosystem.
I'm a 2 week novice, first 3DP, so Bambu Studio is all I know. A few good YouTube tutorials, I can find link to one I'm watching. My buddy told me Studio is quite close to Orca, in some areas better, other areas worse or 'different'. I'll let the experts weigh in on that. I think Orca allows one to output to many common printer formats, including Bambu. That is his workflow more because of Orca familiarity. So now if I understand subject title correctly, that will end soon? ie. Orca can still spit out a file but Bambu is closing the door to importing external app files & must stay inside their slicer ecosystem? Am I interpreting correctly?
There has been massive outcry from the community about this change.
I’m far from an expert and don’t have a Bambu machine but as I understand the issue, folks who used Orca slicer to control their machines are going to be cut off and will have to send their prints to Bambu connect to print.
There was a message from Bambu that they were working with the Orca development team on allowing access but the lead orca developer posted on Reddit that Bambu has since backed away from that idea.
Anyone reading all this might think there is a massive problem - a lot of FUD. For most people who just want to print reliably and conveniently these major brands work great.
Basically, I want true plug and play and I don't want gotchas. I don't want to have to debug a print to figure out what went wrong and I don't want to have to fine tune settings to get good prints. I just want it to work - first time, everytime!
To free myself from this constraint, I want to print PA16, ABS, and ASA - which place me in the 'bridgeport' class rather than in the RF35 level of market.
If all the rhetoric and hysteria about Bambu are to be believed, there should be a glut of used Carbon X1s on the market real soon real cheap.I'm also waiting it out a bit longer for a PA and ABS printer and the A1 is a suitable stop-gap for me. With the price and capability of the A1 on the market, my buying decision factored in what I'm missing out on if I otherwise kept waiting. This is also because I've changed career and no longer have free access to the work printer.But MakerWorld market is just so much more mature now (thanks to Bambu) that I find myself just wanting to print a bunch of things and play with some ideas more than before.
I'm giving away the A1 to my nieces and nephews once I see something else. Maybe I'll even find a reason to keep and run two printers?
If all the rhetoric and hysteria about Bambu are to be believed, there should be a glut of used Carbon X1s on the market real soon real cheap.
My burning question is: Do I want to print the things that an A1 can print? or do I want a printer that prints things that Pro4, XIC, anycubic, etc can print?
I'm also waiting it out a bit longer for a PA and ABS printer and the A1 is a suitable stop-gap for me.