• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

Yard sale bargains

whydontu said:
Always site your sources. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381007/

So the formula needs to be split into Pong(f) and Pong(m) and a suitable conversion factor calculated
Click to expand...

I'm surprised they got away with publishing research like that. I thought any research that might show gender inequality was strictly forbidden.

Then again, this is a paper study of existing research and it presents the view that the female gender is superior. Which of course is true.

Too funny! Can you believe I actually read your reference but seldom watch YouTube! Something seriously wrong with me......

Pong(f) and Pong(m) it is! But I don't think you need a conversion factor since Pong(f) is >= Pong(m).

I need to get a life!
 
Well, as long as we're throwing out frozen salmon cutting advice, a sawzall with a metal cutting blade will get through it pretty well also, but the salmon dust is a bit of a pain to clean out of the blade swapping mechanism.
 
Six O Two said:
Well, as long as we're throwing out frozen salmon cutting advice, a sawzall with a metal cutting blade will get through it pretty well also, but the salmon dust is a bit of a pain to clean out of the blade swapping mechanism.
Click to expand...
Ah, agreed, but we’re all machinists and a Sawzall is just not precise enough to get a straight cut that would be acceptable to this group
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top