• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

What's this 9.5" long Test bar telling me?

Susquatch

Ultra Member
Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Now as to this chinese lathes being misaligned from the factory, I honestly think not (badly at least) as they do build to a spec. I think the mis-alignment comes during shipping and handling. Again light duty and not having the same clamping strength as heavier units.

I dunno about that one. I think it's a lot easier to screw up a factory alignment than we might think. And I'm also not very confident at all in the factory doing it right. We have seen some examples right here on the forum that make my head spin. Some of us get a great machine, and some of us don't. Maybe it happened in shipment, maybe it was built that way. I make few if any assumptions about how any machine was built until after I evaluate and qualify it. You are an optimist and I am a pessimist on this matter! LOL! But then again, maybe the glass isn't half full or half empty. Maybe it's just over designed....
 

PeterT

Ultra Member
Premium Member
@Degen OK, this is becoming painful again. I'm going to tap out soon. Please re-read the first sentence of my post #94.
I have already stated for the sake of this simplified example that the bed is not twisted. So just set that aside...

So where am I telling anyone to start with a twisted bed & immediately start evaluating HS twist? By writing that sentence I mean both in the physical sense (the lathe has been pre-levelled) and in the geometric model sense (assume lathe bed plane is flat and HS is aligned to it). So you are preaching to the choir. I said both misalignment modes potentially contribute to the condition of taper and they both need to be checked off the list.

What your methodology still fails to address is this. Your lathe is first levelled (un-twisted) to the best your ability which is ALWAYS the way we should start out. We agree on that & always have. And it cuts a taper. So what do you do? You twist it & re-assess the coupon. It is now no longer level, it is now twisted to some extent. It still cuts a taper, so you twist some more, hopefully converging. If it does eventually cut a cylinder, happy you. But what if you reach a point where it still cuts a taper & the bed is slowly becoming a pretzel with increased jacking? If you repeat this 10 times, is that the point it might occur to you that there may be another factor like HS alignment and any amount of additional twisting may be futile? And maybe that singular HS adjustment removes all that TS jacking & you discover it wasn't even necessary to begin with? Now who has a bucket of swarf & is chasing their tail? I appreciate you wanting to save my time, but you are making some assumptions you cant back up. You 'assume' the HS wont move 'much' on a bolt-on lathe. Really? Those words made a problem disappear? Wouldn't it be better to measure HS yaw somehow if possible? How would YOU propose to measure it? Because you've already exhausted the taper evaluation measurement. Its a silly hypothetical example, but hopefully you get what I'm driving at.

I'm getting a vibe you think I'm perched on a high pedestal dictating useless trivia & afraid to get my hands dirty. I've digested the conventional mantra. I own a Starrett level & used it. I've adjusted my feet. I've also been in the back of my lathe, its how I was able to include pictures of the undocumented adjustment screws. My lathe is pretty good for my purposes but that's not the point. The only reason I've bothered to step back & think about this some more is to try & quantify the potential significance of HS yaw. Yes, its of academic interest if you want to use that word. So is having a map or GPS before heading down the road in the wrong direction.
 

Susquatch

Ultra Member
Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Another "precision" lathe alignment test bar is late. I already got a refund for the last one which never arrived. The new one (different vendor different price) was supposed to come today. According to the new vendor, if it doesn't arrive by Saturday, I can request a refund. I'll prolly do that but I'll be a bit disappointed. I was actually looking forward to qualifying it.
 
@Degen OK, this is becoming painful again. I'm going to tap out soon. Please re-read the first sentence of my post #94.
I have already stated for the sake of this simplified example that the bed is not twisted. So just set that aside...

So where am I telling anyone to start with a twisted bed & immediately start evaluating HS twist? By writing that sentence I mean both in the physical sense (the lathe has been pre-levelled) and in the geometric model sense (assume lathe bed plane is flat and HS is aligned to it). So you are preaching to the choir. I said both misalignment modes potentially contribute to the condition of taper and they both need to be checked off the list.

What your methodology still fails to address is this. Your lathe is first levelled (un-twisted) to the best your ability which is ALWAYS the way we should start out. We agree on that & always have. And it cuts a taper. So what do you do? You twist it & re-assess the coupon. It is now no longer level, it is now twisted to some extent. It still cuts a taper, so you twist some more, hopefully converging. If it does eventually cut a cylinder, happy you. But what if you reach a point where it still cuts a taper & the bed is slowly becoming a pretzel with increased jacking? If you repeat this 10 times, is that the point it might occur to you that there may be another factor like HS alignment and any amount of additional twisting may be futile? And maybe that singular HS adjustment removes all that TS jacking & you discover it wasn't even necessary to begin with? Now who has a bucket of swarf & is chasing their tail? I appreciate you wanting to save my time, but you are making some assumptions you cant back up. You 'assume' the HS wont move 'much' on a bolt-on lathe. Really? Those words made a problem disappear? Wouldn't it be better to measure HS yaw somehow if possible? How would YOU propose to measure it? Because you've already exhausted the taper evaluation measurement. Its a silly hypothetical example, but hopefully you get what I'm driving at.

I'm getting a vibe you think I'm perched on a high pedestal dictating useless trivia & afraid to get my hands dirty. I've digested the conventional mantra. I own a Starrett level & used it. I've adjusted my feet. I've also been in the back of my lathe, its how I was able to include pictures of the undocumented adjustment screws. My lathe is pretty good for my purposes but that's not the point. The only reason I've bothered to step back & think about this some more is to try & quantify the potential significance of HS yaw. Yes, its of academic interest if you want to use that word. So is having a map or GPS before heading down the road in the wrong direction.
Lets correct some errors here, never twist to correct. First check is between centers at the ends, this eliminates HS misalignment from the equation (for the moment), then turn a couple of locations in the middle, identifies if the bed is rockered or straight. If rockered it will turn a taper, so lets check/correct that first as it effects your base for measurement. Once done you have a non twisted straight lathe. This was all done on centers to isolate the issues.

Still turning a taper in the chuck on to HS/spindle alignment and correction. Your procedure is good here. Do whats required to achieve no taper.

Final thing, repeat on centers as likely the tailstock now needs to be corrected to match the new HS alignment.

All told time to do all the check and do the tweaks 4-16 hrs depending on how bad it is and how good you are. The worst being HS alignment.

Key is isolation of issues dealing with non isolatable issues last as they depend on the others to be correct before final correction.

Added as an after thought, our friendly bantering does lead to insight and understanding for those less experienced as we are on similar pages, just different sequences ;)
 
Last edited:
Top