• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

Tecnico's Shop Window

Lol! I have steadfastly avoided letting myself be sucked into that black hole. I have enough things on my wish to do list without adding another. I just finished fixing a camera and I’m thinking about another to make one more out of two….:rolleyes:

It would be good to have a friend with one though…..;)

D. :cool:
I totally agree. It's very easy to develop that hammer syndrome where everything looks like a nail. OTOH, custom things like hose attachments really can't be easily solved by anything but a 3D printer. Yes. one can use a slip roll, shear, brake and welder to make some custom ones. Or make wooden ones as patterns and cast metal ones from that.

But I do know people who have moved to the dark side and the metal/wood shop gets very little attention unless it's to build something for the 3D printer.
 
Couldn't agree more, yet I'm still trying to resist... But for me at least, the biggest draw for getting a 3d printer has been the idea of printing my own shopvac hose fittings...
And now the scary part! the 3D printing is easy and ultimately not that expensive both in time and parts since you can leave it unattended for the 8 hours it takes to print something big.

The real part of 3D printing is the CAD drawings that are turned into STL files which are turned into G-Code. If you aren't using CAD yet that's the place to start. And if you're not sure what needs to be drawn, pick something. I gained a lot of experience by creating an assembly for my Gingery Lathe. I'd already built the lathe but I took Dave Gingery's drawings and turned them into 3D parametric and then combined them into an assembly. Totally just for practice.

Compound Slide Assembly.jpg

I didn't do the whole lathe. Just the compound and then a few other bits when I converted it to use my Electronic Lead Screw.
 
the 3D printing is easy and ultimately not that expensive both in time and parts

I've managed to stay proficient enough with Solidworks even though I switched out of that line of work a long time ago, so I'm fine with the CAD part, although I could see how it might be steep learning curve for others who aren't familiar with the parametric 3d modelling paradigm. My personal opposition to 3d printing is mostly because I'd prefer to not contribute to the mountains of plastic being generated currently and I fear that the minute I got one, I'd manage to fill bins upon bins of garbage plastic from non-conforming parts. Maybe when home laser-sintering machines become affordable, I'll jump in then, lol.
 
Last edited:
I've managed to stay proficient enough with Solidworks even though I switched out of that line of work a long time ago, so I'm fine with the CAD part, although I could see how it might be steep learning curve for others who aren't familiar with the parametric 3d modelling paradigm. My personal opposition to 3d printing is mostly because I'd prefer to not contribute to the mountains of plastic being generated currently and I fear that the minute I got one, I'd manage to fill bins upon bins of garbage plastic from non-conforming parts. Maybe when home laser-sintering machines become affordable, I'll jump in then, lol.

Another Solidworks (Mechanical Desktop/Inventor/CREO/NX) driver here.

I agree with your thoughts on all the junk I could create on a whim with good intentions!

D :cool:
 
It’s time to follow up on a project I started a while back that started out with making a bushing with a fixed internal key. That thread is here:

Keyed Bushing Thread

The bushing was the starting point for re-powering the drill press my father made from scratch, including castings, about 70 years ago. The project is adapting a treadmill motor/controller with the objective of increasing the speed range and getting rid of a two stage belt drive I had added some years ago.

I wanted to use the multi-vee drive belt system the treadmills have so I needed to make a new driven pulley, the challenges there were cutting the grooves and fitting a brass plain bushing/bearing in the pulley. As it turned out, once I ground a tool for the groove profile, machining it was easy, about the same as cutting a thread without the helix.

TW-36.jpg

Fitting the bushing was a bit of an exercise in math and careful machining. I was aiming to hit the same ID size of the existing bushing and cut the OD so it was a press fit in the pulley housing. If I recall, I aimed for about .0025 for the press fit. I actually fit the bushing in the aluminum pulley using differential expansion (heat) rather than pressing it in.

After doing the math, I put the bushing in the fridge and the pulley in the oven and the bushing just dropped in loosely until the pulley cooled down. I think I used 400F/204C. That was my first try at doing something like that so I was quite pleased at how it worked out.

TW-37.jpg

The rest of the story is the treadmill motor and drive electronics. I grafted the treadmill adjustable motor mount onto a plate that bolts nicely to the drill press bracket and adapted the electronics.

The treadmill uses a PWM controller that gets its speed setting inputs from a set of analog membrane switch buttons so after a bit of tracing the circuits of each button press I was able to mimic them with a single button and a rotary switch. I also incorporated a dedicated switch to replace the STOP button of the treadmill.

What this gave me was the option of up to 9 speeds ranging from very slow to fast plus fine adjust and all I had left to do was measure the speeds and mark my switch settings.

There are several reasons I went this way vs. an SCR controller and a potentiometer etc. First I wanted to use as much of the free material I salvaged from the treadmill as possible rather than inventing things. I also didn’t want to break new ground for me like understanding SCR controllers.

Using the control electronics from the treadmill takes advantage of its built in safety controls. I had read the article by Days (Dazecars.com/YouTube) where he blew up the same power board because his band saw grabbed and stalled. He didn’t use the treadmill control board.

The complete treadmill power & control system gives me the overload safety function that's built into the control board. If the motor is overloaded the controller senses this and “folds back” the drive power until the overload is removed or the machine is shut down.

I mounted the power & control boards in a 8 x 10 x 4 metal enclosure made by Bud Industries that I bought on Amazon, amazingly cheap at ~$20, delivered.

TW-38.jpg

The “finished” product looks like this (Awaiting painting and a belt guard….):

TW-39.jpg
D :cool:
 
Next Project: Standard Modern 1120 Model 2000 Lathe

I've acquired the 1120 series 2000 Standard Modern lathe discussed THIS THREAD and I'm making this the home of discussions about cleaning it up and bringing it back on stream.

First off, I went and picked it up about a couple of weeks ago. I rented a U-Drive pickup and motorcycle trailer which is lighter than their dual axle trailer. It turned out well because to load we had to move the trailer across the lawn by hand and then hook up the truck. The lathe was in a shed at the back corner of the lawn with trees and clothesline poles providing obstacles. Luckily, while the lawn wasn't frozen or covered in snow it was firm enough to drive on. I did have to drive around the house & over the front lawn, staying away from the septic tank, to get back to the driveway!

With a bit of finagling we put the lathe on the wheeled dolly I had previously built to move my First mill and easily rolled it up on the trailer for the trip home.

TW-40.jpg

After a bit of digging in the basement, the seller turned up a 1HP, single phase Baldor motor, a couple of well used 3 jaw chucks, a Rohm ½” drill chuck/MT3 arbour, a couple lantern tool posts and a of bunch of matching tool holders. I am missing the curved boat(?) from both though. One chuck has a D1-6 backing plate but the pinions are cracked, the other has no backing plate.

Generally the machine looks OK although covered in a thick layer that looks sort of like Cosmoline but I imagine it’s just old, dried oil. The ways generally look good although by the tailstock will need some clean-up. I got to lift the cover of the gearbox and it has a fill of thick, clean looking oil and everything inside looks great. What I could see of the QC geabox looked just as good. Cosmetically someone seems to have partially painted parts of the machine (with Tremclad??) so I’m thinking eventually I want it all one color.

Big picture: I think I have acquired a machine in fundamentally good shape with some clean up and TLC required.

TW-41.jpg
 
Last edited:
First question:

I'm not sure that the motor pulley that came with the machine is correct, it's a two step unit and the dimensions are as follows:

Overall width = 1.480
Small pulley OD = 3.570
Small pulley minor dia. = 2.47
Large pulley OD = 4.500
Large pulley minor dia = 3.400
Shaft size = 5/8

Anyone out there with an 1120 Series 2000 that can confirm that I have the right pulley?

Thanks,

D :cool:
 
It’s about time for an update to my shop thread.

I’ve been picking away at the Standard Modern 1120, it’s running now with a 1 phase, 1 HP motor on 220V which called for updates to the heater (trip) coils of the magnetic contactor. The 3 phase, 220 motor is long gone unfortunately. I also needed to make a direction switch lever because the original had disappeared. Used ones can be had for $100+ :oops:

TW-50.JPG


I’ve done a bunch of clean up getting rid of 30 years of grime and solidified oils accumulated all over the machine from sitting around. The main gearbox oil was actually pretty clean and it got changed and I went through the apron to clean up the sediment in the bottom including the remains of a shear pin and a set screw that dropped out. I needed a new spring on one of the selector shaft detents but all is well in there now. A bunch of the flip cap oilers got replaced too.

I’ve also done some painting to clean up things up a bit and make it (mostly) one colour. There wasn’t much paint left on anything on the carriage, got rid of the Tremclad touch-ups too!

The painting is for my pleasure and not to make an old machine look new. Call it pride of ownership but it gives me pleasure to have and use a machine that doesn’t look like $%^&. I managed to get a good match to an industrial colour in Nason Fullthane from NAPA.

Anyhow, some pictures:

These had the “Tremclad tuneup” when I got the machine.

TW-51.JPG


Carriage assy. looks 100% better all one colour and back to original colour.

TW-52.JPG


Next up was getting a chuck on the machine. I had a pristine Burnerd 4 jaw and the well used 3 jaw that came with the machine gave up its back plate for the Burnerd. I actually managed to get some use out of the sketchy lantern toolpost that came with the 1120 after making a new rocker for it. Crawl first then walk, LOL!

TW-53.JPG


Next up was making an adaptation that would let me use the Dicksons toolpost from my Myford “for now” until I came up with something better. Then I roughed out a backing plate blank for the Atlas chuck I picked up thanks to a lead and some help from this group. (Thanks guys!). By then I had made up a CAD back splash to keep from spreading chips all over my shop.

TW-54.JPG


After spending some time on the mill laying out the chuck mounting pattern and the D1-4 stud layout I set the mount up on the Myford to do the final bore and mating taper.

I wound up making a new connection plate for the TTA because I ran out of travel with the original because I had offset the TTA slide to make room for the DRO scale. The upside down boring bar is for the same reason but on reflection I probably could have spun the tool holder around to gain back some of the travel. Getting the taper fit right was a bit finicky but in the end I’m pleased with how it turned out.

TW-55.JPG


Next up was dealing with the tool holder problem. That grotty lantern HAD to go!

I was on the fence about the generic Chinese BXA style of tool holder and whether it had to be wedge or piston and how much I wanted to invest in tool blocks while getting to know what would work for me what with the comments around the forum about what tool & insert and size was the best. I didn’t want to commit to a system that I hadn’t actually seen that might not fit all the tool candidates that seem to be recommended.

So, being a bit of a non-conformist, I decided to try something a bit different and roll my own custom QCTP. That way I could make something that I could tailor to fit my tooling range as I see fit and the big investment would be my time not cash.

That turns out to be something that I’ve seen called a “Norman Patent” based design. It's said to have been used in the fab shops of Rolls Royce which is good enough for me, LOL! Plus it seems to be embraced in the Myford world.

It’s based around a sturdy/rigid post with the tool holder clamped to the post. Height and angle adjustment is built into the system.

Mine looks like this:

TW-56.JPG


TW-57.JPG

The post (4140HT) is fixed to the compound and is not normally adjusted unless you want to move it relative to the compound.

Cutting height is adjustable via the stainless 10-32 SHCS on the top and the tool holder is locked to the post by the 5/16 SHCS you see on the side of the split holder. It’s nice to be able to loosen off the clamp bolt and swing the cutting edge under your height setter while tweaking the adjuster then lock the tool down where it needs to be for the cut. The height adjuster has a friction lock so it stays put between uses.

By my experience so far, I LIKE IT! Compared to the Dicksons toolpost I have on my Myford the assembly seems quite rigid which is going to give good cutting performance. I expected this because of the big post and the clamping arrangement. That is probably more secure than the cam locked piston or wedge of the typical toolpost. The tool holder has a secure grip on the post once it’s tightened in place.

I’d say it’s quite rigid because because the first few serious cuts have been with the parting blade and those have gone very well, being able to peel off down to a thin foil from a 1” or 2” CRS bar at 50 or 90 RPM with no complaints or chatter etc. using an HSS blade. Much more comfortable! In the end, the part separated with only about .040” dia. remaining.

TW-58.JPG


Tool holders; 5/8”, ½” and parting blades complete and some WIP:

TW-59.JPG


That’s about it for now, in the on deck circle are: fitting the steady rest I got from @justin1, the DRO, converting the cross & compound lead screws to imperial and a more permanent back splash.

Oh, we’re still just getting to know each other but the more I’m using the SM1120 the more I’m liking it! Good solid machine with good ergonomics!

D :cool:
 
That’s about it for now, in the on deck circle are: fitting the steady rest I got from @justin1, the DRO, converting the cross & compound lead screws to imperial and a more permanent back splash.

Oh, we’re still just getting to know each other but the more I’m using the SM1120 the more I’m liking it! Good solid machine with good ergonomics!

D :cool:
Looks like you have been busy. And that lathe is looking sharp. That steady may even match the paint dam near. Looking forward to seeing it complete.
 
Looks like you have been busy. And that lathe is looking sharp. That steady may even match the paint dam near. Looking forward to seeing it complete.

Thanks. It definitely looks different from when I got it! Lots of potential to unlock still. I even did a bit of wood turning on it this aft., the parting tool did great!

Yeah, the steady is quite close….in colour, but I’ve spent a little time scoping out adapting it and it’s not quite as close as I was hoping for. If I was an accomplished cast iron welder I’d just make a base and weld ‘er up but I’m going to think on it a bit more for now before cutting metal.

Can’t make any mistakes looking at it and thinking about it! I think it’s going to be a nice piece when it’s up and running. :)

D :cool:
 
Back
Top