• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

Anyone using ChatGTP?

WOW!
I just asked ChatGPT a question about the Charlie Kirk assination and could believe the answer. I dont want to get involved in politics AT ALL but I believe my experience is very much related to the topic of this thread.
Please someone else try a query.
 
I know my post sounds like click bait garbage thing but I am hoping others will relay their experience before I discuss my experience .
 
WOW!
I just asked ChatGPT a question about the Charlie Kirk assination and could believe the answer. I dont want to get involved in politics AT ALL but I believe my experience is very much related to the topic of this thread.
Please someone else try a query.
If you want to compare answers we'll need to know what question you asked.
 
If you ask who Charlie Kirk was Leo just gives the basic information, much like a Wikipedia article.
Nothing even remotely controversial.
Same with Google AI.
Same with Chat GPT.
If you ask why he was assassinated Leo says there is no evidence he was.
Google AI gives the basic information.
Chat GPT does the same as Google.
 
Last edited:
If I plug Charlie Kirk in, to ChatGpt, nothing more, it returns with a lengthy article based on opinions and not facts
 
Ok I asked ChatGPT " What caliber of rifle was used in the Charlie Kirk assination" ( I know, pretty morbid but...)
Here is the screenshot of the reply I got.
Screenshot_20260128_113838_ChatGPT.jpg
 
And ChatGPT always seems to name my chats with something a little bit descriptive and helpful. It named this query " Charlie Kirk assination hoax"
 
Folks , you are trying to talk to AI as it is a human with Universe size knowledgebase and Universe size intelligence. It is not. It is just a pile of raffinated silicon. I am working with AI agents Enterprise level (paid) on a daly basis and I should say it is VERY "smart", but it is the same principal as everywhere - Garbage in > Garbage out. If your model is based on speculations and insinuations your result will be hallucination. LOL Opposite is not guaranteed.
 
Folks , you are trying to talk to AI as it is a human with Universe size knowledgebase and Universe size intelligence. It is not. It is just a pile of raffinated silicon. I am working with AI agents Enterprise level (paid) on a daly basis and I should say it is VERY "smart", but it is the same principal as everywhere - Garbage in > Garbage out. If your model is based on speculations and insinuations your result will be hallucination. LOL Opposite is not
Nobody " is talking to it as a human with universe size knowledge and universe size intelligence" I am simply asking for factual information and am surprised what it came back with, for me and others. No "Garbage in " from our end and no "speculations and insinuations" either.
 
Folks , you are trying to talk to AI as it is a human with Universe size knowledgebase and Universe size intelligence. It is not. It is just a pile of raffinated silicon. I am working with AI agents Enterprise level (paid) on a daly basis and I should say it is VERY "smart", but it is the same principal as everywhere - Garbage in > Garbage out. If your model is based on speculations and insinuations your result will be hallucination. LOL Opposite is not guaranteed.
etc.

You must have missed the memo 😛
 
like all tools, it has its uses. If you use a hammer instead of screwdriver to drive a screw, then expect appropriate results.
I'm using it to write controller code, because frankly I am tired of typing. It needs some hand holding but with more epxerience, I am getter much better at getting the resul;ts I need.
 
Back
Top