DPittman
Ultra Member
I'm just a bit slower than the average turtle.....but I eventually get there...Yup missed that memo and your point too.
I think you are pointing out that AI is presented to have all the answers for us.
I'm just a bit slower than the average turtle.....but I eventually get there...Yup missed that memo and your point too.
But how can you trust it, if it gives opinions, and not facts?I'm just a bit slower than the average turtle.....but I eventually get there...
I think you are pointing out that AI is presented to have all the answers for us.
Exactly and not just opinions but factually incorrect information!But how can you trust it, if it gives opinions, and not facts?
Or is that the goal to make it more human, by having opinions?
I think you are pointing out that AI is presented to have all the answers for us.
like all tools, it has its uses. If you use a hammer instead of screwdriver to drive a screw, then expect appropriate results.
Exactly and not just opinions but factually incorrect information!
If someone is trying to make it more human by giving it opinions, I say GIVE IT UP!, I want FACTS to help me decipher thru all the fact-less opinions out there.
I wish we had NPR radio stations in Canada. There was an incident in Minnesota a couple weeks ago, and two hosts were discussing it neutrally. They disagreed on a few things, asked the other side to explain their position, then moved on. I felt they did a good job anyway, part of it is their laws are different, so I'm learning.Exactly and not just opinions but factually incorrect information!
If someone is trying to make it more human by giving it opinions, I say GIVE IT UP!, I want FACTS to help me decipher thru all the fact-less opinions out there.
I know my post sounds like click bait garbage thing but I am hoping others will relay their experience before I discuss my experience .
Very interesting. I've only played with Gemini and ChatGPT. I have found that ChatGPT has given me answers that I dis not agree with and eventually if I pushed hard enough I got answers that I felt were much better and correct. A recent example was a query I made regarding "garage ready" freezers. Initially ChatGPT basically regurgitated all the marketing crap that the companies put out about the product. After several further inquiries and push back it got better and admitted its first response were poor.The question I asked was: "Was Charlie Cook Assasinated or was it just a hoax?"
Gemini - Says he was assassinated and gives details including date, location, assassin, motive, weapon, and court status. When asked if it's a hoax, it said absolutely not but the web was flooded by hoax stories made up to direct the narrative in their favour.
Perplexity - same as gemini
Claude - has no information. When asked why not, it simply said the media is unreliable and the media sources it has access to are not reliable.
Grok - says he was Assasinated and that hoaxes were everywhere because people are gullible and fringe elements love to exploit opportunities like this.
ChatGPT - now cones in flavours. The professional version was similar to gemini and perplexity.
Co-Pilot - said it was a hoax. And proceeded to give many reasons why people incorrectly believe it actually happened. When I asked why he hasn't been seen in public, it said that he had been assassinated! When I asked it why the two answers differed, it explained that it's first answer was based on the frequency of reports without checking their validity. It's second answer was based on probing only credible sources and ignored sources with a dubious history.
If you need help debugging this - please start a separate thread and I'll try to help
Respectfully - Charlie Kirk assassination/death/killing is highly politicized item , along with many other things that are happening in modern history - there are more emotions and speculations than factual, There is no unbiased input or pure facts. Media is going to left or right, depends who owns the media. And AI just following (collating) data that is most available in media - AI has no access to police, FBI, NSA, or whatever data . I would never ask AI about that - I am sticking to the strictly professional (technical and technological ) exchange with AI.Nobody " is talking to it as a human with universe size knowledge and universe size intelligence" I am simply asking for factual information and am surprised what it came back with, for me and others. No "Garbage in " from our end and no "speculations and insinuations" either.
I still have yet to find out how to integrate AI into my life. Nor A1 (I know how to cook a steak). Sure for coding applications I could implement it, but for daily life? My life ain't that complicated I need computer intervention.....