• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

Working on my South Bend 9C

@PeterT that is very clear, thank you! I did try to center the ball and keep it's placement consistent across testing, but who knows.

No V block to hand but I understand the principlenand can rig something up tomorrow!
 
Golem Pens said:
I follow the crude sketches and error stacking but not so much how the different probe types fit in. The question I jump to is how do I eliminate/check those variables to narrow it down...
Click to expand...
Hi Micheal,
The flat bit that Peter shows is called an "Elephants Foot" !
Not difficult to make and will allow you to measure accurately the position of a curved surface.
A hole drilled in a bit of bar that fits over the gauge plunger. Just like the drawing !
 
Yes looks like about 0.0004" TIR from where I'm viewing which is great. I've kind of lost track what exactly you are insertng & testing, but generally an ER collet itself should be about the same runout so I'd guess collectively you would be in the 0 - 0.001" clamping on a perfectly true dowel pin. So try that next, ideally on the same collet size you are using. If you part is measuring something substantially more than 0.001" its likely not circular/concentric. Now this holds true by positioning the DTI ball right close to edge of the collet. If you have a healthy part stickout & the part is cocked for whatever reason, it could measure runout because of that angle. If the collet was not quite tight enough or the part had a slight taper... Again, ER is better than other holding systems in this regard because it has more longidudenal contact area over its grip (as opposed to 5C which is more of a nose pinch). Only other thing I can think of is if your part is a hollow tube & tightning it in the collet manages to distort the wall thickness. This is typically a 3J or 4J chuck issue though. Again, ER is better here because it is a relatively radial grip force, meaning equal pressure through each of its leaves.

All you can do is add one step or part at a time & try & isolate it. But looks like you have eliminated the ER seat. Last question, you are snapping the collet into the end cap ring correctly each time before tigtening right? I dont even think it will work otherwise but just mentioning because some guys seem to have more stubborn rings.
 
Last edited:
@PeterT yes there has been a lot going on... I'm glad that stepping back to the start is helpful.

I don't have a true precision ground pin, but I used the shaft of a decent reamer as an analog the other day. Not the same collet unfortunately, but a close size at least. Not sure if this is accurate enough though.

And yes, the collets ARE properly seated!

Control - 0.496" reamer shaft
CRA - 0° to collet mark: https://photos.app.goo.gl/S77tF4TMD1rcke8R8
CRB - 180° to collet mark: https://photos.app.goo.gl/rr7EV76A5m1GT19eA
To my eye these are the same, about 0.0010 TIR. Indicates that the collet/spindle/machine is okay.
 
Golem Pens said:
To my eye these are the same, about 0.0010 TIR. Indicates that the collet/spindle/machine is okay.
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree with your conclusions. Nonetheless, I wonder about the 1 thou. Not because it's a problem but rather to help us understand your machine and your setup. Does the high spot stay with the reamer shaft as you index it, or does it stay with the collet, or does it follow some other relationship?

Getting 1 thou at that much stick out without using some way to adjust axial alignment is very good. What is it like up close to the collet?

Another thing that might be worth exploring is the stiffness of your spindle. It's possible that the cutting forces are displacing the spindle a bit such that runout with no load is good but runout with cutting forces applied is not. If so, improving the runout takes a different direction than we have been discussing.

You can do this test by pulling or pushing your reamer shaft as consistently as you can while measuring the play at the collet face on the same plane as the load. This should be done at least every 90 degrees - more if you find big differences. Don't let the results scare you. It's normal to get much bigger numbers than in the unloaded tests you have done. You just want to know what it is like.

Basically, I'm trying to understand why your reamer numbers are so much better than your mandrel numbers.
 
Okie dokie, we have more data @Susquatch

- This was using the same 7/16" reamer shaft as before.
- Since I mounted the DTI on my carriage, I checked the neutral height at both measurement points with the spindle not moving. At 4" out, it was .001"lower. I also did the same, and a rotating test while supported by a live center, and there was >.0005" runout. So I imagine that other reading is due to bed wear, not a warped reamer shaft.

- Three measurements were taken:
1) Deflection measured at collet.
2) Runout at collet.
3) Runout 4" from collet (as far as I can go, and realistically the farthest I would be out with any regularity.



Index locationDeflection at colletRunout at colletRunout at 4"
0°.002".0005".003"
45°.002".001".004"
90°.002".001".004"
135°.003".001".006"
180°.0025".001".003"
225°.003".001".005"
270°.0025".0005".006"
315°.002".0005".004"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top