Learned many new things from Dabbler's explanation! I had a hunch that round vs rectangular had some historical significance or other practical purpose I wasn't yet aware of. The round ones have a fine pitch threaded center hole which allows them to be attached to one another, or attached to other things I suppose. Rectangular gage blocks, well the good ones, can be wrung together to make the stack. Less accurate class or even a bit of dust or fingerprint usually makes wringing difficult or impossible.
I check my micrometers with the typical 'post' type standards only because they were included with the mic. They compared well to same size gage block. You can get them onsey-twosey or progressive sets, But I wouldn't buy them if you already have a gage block set. I cant think of any reason why you couldn't calibrate mic on gage blocks directly. I suspect most hobbyist gage blocks are probably way more accurate than the repeatability & resolution of most hobbyist micrometers. At this level you can see the effect of shop temperature variation.
I've read different opinions about whether to calibrate at the max nominal opening vs minimum or even middle. For example calibrate at 1.0000 and now zero might be 0.0001". Or zero the jaws to 0.0000" and now the standard reads 0.9999. Or maybe calibrate to 0.5000" and now either min or max could deviate from 0.0000 and 1.0000. I suspect the answer lies in the mic itself, intended purpose & typical measurement range.
I'ts interesting to just measure the exact same gage block just to see how much variation you get purely from positioning or clutch / click tension etc. Micrometer screws can wear in preferential use areas just like lead screws. OTOH unless you have the ability to make parts to this accuracy (usually grinding & lapping), too many extra zeros may be more of a distraction. My cylinder liner bores were lapped to to the same tenth mark on bore gage which required a lot of work, But I'm not kidding myself, I'm sure thats an average across the micro hill tops & will probably be different when I measure them again & the assembly stress relieves & normalizes...never mind wear when it runs.
I check my micrometers with the typical 'post' type standards only because they were included with the mic. They compared well to same size gage block. You can get them onsey-twosey or progressive sets, But I wouldn't buy them if you already have a gage block set. I cant think of any reason why you couldn't calibrate mic on gage blocks directly. I suspect most hobbyist gage blocks are probably way more accurate than the repeatability & resolution of most hobbyist micrometers. At this level you can see the effect of shop temperature variation.
I've read different opinions about whether to calibrate at the max nominal opening vs minimum or even middle. For example calibrate at 1.0000 and now zero might be 0.0001". Or zero the jaws to 0.0000" and now the standard reads 0.9999. Or maybe calibrate to 0.5000" and now either min or max could deviate from 0.0000 and 1.0000. I suspect the answer lies in the mic itself, intended purpose & typical measurement range.
I'ts interesting to just measure the exact same gage block just to see how much variation you get purely from positioning or clutch / click tension etc. Micrometer screws can wear in preferential use areas just like lead screws. OTOH unless you have the ability to make parts to this accuracy (usually grinding & lapping), too many extra zeros may be more of a distraction. My cylinder liner bores were lapped to to the same tenth mark on bore gage which required a lot of work, But I'm not kidding myself, I'm sure thats an average across the micro hill tops & will probably be different when I measure them again & the assembly stress relieves & normalizes...never mind wear when it runs.
Attachments
Last edited: