New to me Bridgeport Mill

PeterT

Ultra Member
Premium Member
Maybe the joke is on me. I thought they were 'metricating' a common 1/2" thread, hence my attempt at ha-ha.
 

Susquatch

Ultra Member
Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
It was definitely funny as heck to me. But I can laugh easily at all the dumb things I do myself so I feel like that entitles me to laugh at everyone else too!

In my minds eye, I see this Chinese web guy posting the add on the Ali website, sees the 1/2 for the stud size, and says to himself, "Wow those engineers can be dumb sometimes - they forgot the M in front of the stud size. No biggie, I'll fix it for them."

Nonetheless, I'd like some locks like that for my mills and the price is right.

Do you think it's actually an imperial half inch lock stud that they figured needed an M in front of it or do you think it really is a metric version of a 1/2" lock with oddball pitch and diameter?
 

PeterT

Ultra Member
Premium Member
Sometimes they are receptive to answering questions , might save you a desk ornament if it's truly metric and only 'close to' 1/2".
And actually - is a real Bridgeport fine or coarse threads 1/2"?

This picture kind of appears making a distinction to 'British'?, OD = 12.78mm = 0.491"
 

Attachments

  • SNAG-12-15-2021 010.jpg
    SNAG-12-15-2021 010.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 2

Susquatch

Ultra Member
Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Sometimes they are receptive to answering questions , might save you a desk ornament if it's truly metric and only 'close to' 1/2".
And actually - is a real Bridgeport fine or coarse threads 1/2"?

This picture kind of appears making a distinction to 'British'?, OD = 12.78mm = 0.491"

Good point. I'll check my BP and then see if they can help.
 

Tomc938

Ultra Member
Premium Member
I know from experience that you can run at 1/2" - 13 tap through what I assume was a M12 x 1.75 nut and end up with a nut that works quite well on either 1/2" or 12mm. Don't ask. (It was late at night and cold in the garage)
 

deleted_user

Super User
430V is a good thing: take a VFD connect it to 220V and a 3 phase 1:2 step-up transformer to the motor - done.

Jesus, that appears to be a very elegant solution.

Sometimes you just don't connect the dots... Just like the commutator in a DC motor chops DC current into AC current, the 3 phase pwm output of the VFD does as well.

So I have a few issues... what would be the best carrier frequency to program our VFD for if we wanted to use a step up transformer? Also am I correct in assuming that as the magnetic flux travels thru the iron core of the transformer that it may alter the choppy pwm waveform, and if so might that create issues with the output voltage? I'd think potentially the digital signal just may become more sinusoidal and not affect the output voltage... IDK.

Finally would you know where to get a transformer of an appropriate size for less than a new motor cost?
 

Susquatch

Ultra Member
Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Jesus, that appears to be a very elegant solution.

Sometimes you just don't connect the dots... Just like the commutator in a DC motor chops DC current into AC current, the 3 phase pwm output of the VFD does as well.

So I have a few issues... what would be the best carrier frequency to program our VFD for if we wanted to use a step up transformer? Also am I correct in assuming that as the magnetic flux travels thru the iron core of the transformer that it may alter the choppy pwm waveform, and if so might that create issues with the output voltage? I'd think potentially the digital signal just may become more sinusoidal and not affect the output voltage... IDK.

Finally would you know where to get a transformer of an appropriate size for less than a new motor cost?

Those are good questions.

I'd call the VFD manufacturer tech support line to ask that question.

FWIW, I would reverse the process and feed a higher voltage VFD with the transformer rather than feeding the transformer from the VFD. It all gets a lot easier that way and you won't lose so much of the variable speed benefits of the VFD. Just my opinion.
 

YYCHM

(Craig)
Premium Member
Those are good questions.

I'd call the VFD manufacturer tech support line to ask that question.

FWIW, I would reverse the process and feed a higher voltage VFD with the transformer rather than feeding the transformer from the VFD. It all gets a lot easier that way and you won't lose so much of the variable speed benefits of the VFD. Just my opinion.

Apparently putting a transformer between the VFD and motor will not work. The VFD won't see the voltage/current feed back it needs.
 

deleted_user

Super User
Those are good questions.

I'd call the VFD manufacturer tech support line to ask that question.

FWIW, I would reverse the process and feed a higher voltage VFD with the transformer rather than feeding the transformer from the VFD. It all gets a lot easier that way and you won't lose so much of the variable speed benefits of the VFD. Just my opinion.

wont work when I dont have 3 phase power... have to create the 3 phase signal to step up in my case
 

deleted_user

Super User
Apparently putting a transformer between the VFD and motor will not work. The VFD won't see the voltage/current feed back it needs.

Thanks for the answer craig. I had never heard that was a possibility so had never looked into such a thing
 

Dabbler

ersatz engineer
A transformer after the VFD does 2 things that are unforgivable: it changes the inductance of the system, and it changes the apparent inrush current - it is the effective inductance and the inrush current that the vfd uses to produce proper motor response when running at low speeds. At higher speeds, say 30 Hz to 100Hz, your solution would work, but not at peak efficiency.

At alberta prices, it is cheaper to find a 1.5 or 3HP 3ph 220V motor to replace the 575 one instead of the transformer.

[edit] once again - we posted at the same time! oops.
 

Darren

Ultra Member
Premium Member
a
Step up the single phase then feed the VFD at the target voltage.

thats the preferred way, and besides, 600v vfd's are way cheaper on the used market...nobody wants em.

every vfd will accept single phase input, its whether they will trip on phase loss thats the issue. read the manual, see if phase loss can be ignored. That said, theres ways around that usually.
 

Susquatch

Ultra Member
Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
once again - we posted at the same time! oops.

So many posted at the same time I got lost! LMAO!

I even deleted a post because it somehow got pieces that I didn't put there!

Oh well, looks like all the right answers are there now.
 

deleted_user

Super User
A transformer after the VFD does 2 things that are unforgivable: it changes the inductance of the system, and it changes the apparent inrush current - it is the effective inductance and the inrush current that the vfd uses to produce proper motor response when running at low speeds. At higher speeds, say 30 Hz to 100Hz, your solution would work, but not at peak efficiency.

At alberta prices, it is cheaper to find a 1.5 or 3HP 3ph 220V motor to replace the 575 one instead of the transformer.

[edit] once again - we posted at the same time! oops.
got it.
 
Top