Yep. Strictly bicycles at that point.It seems pretty clear that he meant pedal bikes there.
Yep. Strictly bicycles at that point.It seems pretty clear that he meant pedal bikes there.
That is true of his comments earlier in the conversation. But my comment was in response to his comment here:
JustaDB said:
I do not wear a helmet while bicycling. The day I'm forced to, I'll throw my bicycle through the front doors of the police station. Under 18? Fine. Mandatory for all? Bite me.
It seems pretty clear that he meant pedal bikes there.
If you follow the quotes backwards it will be more clear.
I think that's the problem with big long threads where people jump all over the place. Easy to debate who said what and why. That's why I prefer to quote the comment or question I am responding to. It makes it easier to follow the sequence.
Well if you're not wearing your tin foil helmet when you watch TV you're obviously a rebellious hooligan who needs direction.Next thing you know, we will require Helmuts to watch tv.
This is fun! His comment quoted justadb who was talking about pedal bikes in that quote. It's important to follow the quotes.
But I agree that the whole thread was all mixed up and lots of folks were mixing subjects. I even said as much.
To be clear though, I agree with helmuts on motorcycles, I don't agree on bicycles - At least not for the way I use them. Next thing you know, we will require Helmuts to go for a walk or watch tv. I'm just not on that page.
So yes, if you disregard everything after the first "Bite me" then you have a point. But obviously.........
Powered unicycles?Ok now scooters! GO!
View attachment 66221
This is fun! His comment quoted justadb who was talking about pedal bikes in that quote. It's important to follow the quotes.
But I agree that the whole thread was all mixed up and lots of folks were mixing subjects. I even said as much.
To be clear though, I agree with helmuts on motorcycles, I don't agree on bicycles - At least not for the way I use them. Next thing you know, we will require Helmuts to go for a walk or watch tv. I'm just not on that page.
To be clear, my post was meant to address the motorcycle helmet portion of the quoted post. That the forum software reduced the visible portion of the quote to not show that is what may have made that unclear. I could have clipped the post to just the relevant portion which may have helped.In my defense, this is what I see/saw on JustaDB's post. I don't see everything after that
View attachment 66205
This really was fun. It turns out that you were right all along. It was painful for me to drag you far enough to get me there, but I am now there. And best of all, I see why and how I fell off the track. Hopefully I learned from it.
I was wrong, you were right, and I did have fun. Why? Cuz it was a good friendly debate that one of us had to lose. I'm glad that it was me.
View attachment 66207
Jeeez, don't you pick up free food?She was lying on the gravel shoulder in the long grass and her front feet were sticking a few inches onto the paved shoulder. Coming back home we noticed that she had been dealt with.
Well if they would have flagged the poor deers' feet while it was still alive maybe it would not have ended up as roadkill.Okay, getting back on track a bit more here, I hurt my guts laughing today.
The niece is over so we went for a hike. Driving out we noticed a road kill deer on the side of the road, pretty much a daily sight around here. She was lying on the gravel shoulder in the long grass and her front feet were sticking a few inches onto the paved shoulder. Coming back home we noticed that she had been dealt with. Someone, presumably Emcon, our ridiculously stupid hiways maintenance contractor, had gotten out of their vehicle and tied yellow caution flagging tape to the deers feet.
Really ?
Usually it's the townies "ooo, look dear, a deer bouncing across the road in front of us!".Well if they would have flagged the poor deers' feet while it was still alive maybe it would not have ended up as roadkill.