• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.
  • Several Regions have held meetups already, but others are being planned or are evaluating the interest. The Calgary Area Meetup is set for Saturday July 12th at 10am. The signup thread is here! Arbutus has also explored interest in a Fraser Valley meetup but it seems members either missed his thread or had other plans. Let him know if you are interested in a meetup later in the year by posting here! Slowpoke is trying to pull together an Ottawa area meetup later this summer. No date has been selected yet, so let him know if you are interested here! We are not aware of any other meetups being planned this year. If you are interested in doing something in your area, let everyone know and make it happen! Meetups are a great way to make new machining friends and get hands on help in your area. Don’t be shy, sign up and come, or plan your own meetup!

Opposites

slow-poke

Ultra Member
I'm mentioning this because I have found this trick incredibly handy over the years.

When I was a kid my brother gifted me a book called a whack on the side of the head, it's a whimsical book about creativity. That was 50 years back and one suggestion about "opposites" in that book, I continue to use over and over as I find it really helpful. Seems that this group (that enjoys making something from nothing) already has a creative bent so perhaps adding "opposites" to your repertoire will be helpful.

IIRC they said when trying to solve a problem, try to jot down ten different ways to solve the problem, the first two or three usually come easy the remainder can be a struggle, they emphasized don't exclude ideas that seem at second thought to be flawed, you can exclude them later. Just get them on the list because even though that solution might not be viable it may offer a partially viable solution. When concocting your list of ten consider opposites as possible solutions when they say opposites you need to think of that term very loosely.

Recent example, CNC lathe conversion, there are times when you want to use the lathe in a completly manual fashion, except the hand cranks no longer exist. Standard solution is to provide a MPG (Manual Pulse Generator) to create the step pulses to the axis motor, so cranking the MPG emulates cranking the old hand-wheel. Typically MPG looks like this...
BA4FDC53-7E8B-4DEB-8A52-EC4C2D26BB89.jpeg

So I had two MPGs, one for the carriage and one for the cross slide. I then eliminated the compound because :
1) the machine is stiffer and hence cuts better without that additional joint.
2) with CNC you can emulate whatever angle you want in software by simply sending the appropriate X & Z pulses. So no need for the compound.

New problem(s), where am I going to mount this new MPG for the compound action? And I'm running out of encoder inputs in fact I have used them all up. Hmmm opposites is my friend again instead of adding another MPGs do the opposite and remove one, and instead add a simple switch to select which axis the MPG is used for X, Z or compound.
 
Last edited:
Interesting

In some situations that's where the internet is such an invaluable resource. With a little research you can quickly find a lot of ways to tackle a problem.
 
I've done a LOT of manual machining with CNC machines and jog wheels and axis selector switch. Fastest, biggest, most rigid manual machine in the building for squaring up stock, and it's not even close to a bridgeport. I wish my Tormach had an MPG wheel instead of the shuttle wheel they come with. A luxury upgrade I'd like to make at some point, but not enough of a priority to divert pesos away from other projects. Now add a resolution switch too, if you don't already have one.

Some prefer to write short MDI programs, but I never found that quicker of better for my needs.

As for problem solving, and unique ways to do it I've always employed back to front thinking. Instead of trying to figure out how to get to what you want from the start, try working backwards from what you "need" to where you are now. I don't know how to explain it, it's always been the most natural way to solve problems for my neurodivergent brain, but it helps to really detach yourself from all the traditional ways you've done things, and come up with new ideas and methods never done before. If you keep following the same path forward, you'll most likely end up at the same destination. Give me a 2d maze puzzle to solve and I always start at the finish and can "see" the path back to the start, near instantly. Starting at the start, I can't see it, and just blindly follow every path forward until I get there.
 
Part of my problem solving is coming up with a design, walk away, forget about it, come back to it, see a bunch of bad ideas, tear it up and start all over. Maybe next time leave a few ideas intact and only scrap part of it. Eventually I have a complete design. The time in between when I am not thinking about it is when a potential solution or new idea often comes to me.

I just went through this process designing a sound isolation booth for my son's music recording.
 
Give me a 2d maze puzzle to solve and I always start at the finish and can "see" the path back to the start, near instantly. Starting at the start, I can't see it, and just blindly follow every path forward until I get there.

I think thats because of the way the designers create them. If you take one of those puzzles and flip it, it won't be quite as easy. And if you think about what I just said, I believe that you will instantly see why.
 
I wish my Tormach had an MPG wheel instead of the shuttle wheel they come with. A luxury upgrade I'd like to make at some point, but not enough of a priority to divert pesos away from other projects. Now add a resolution switch too, if you don't already have one.

Some prefer to write short MDI programs, but I never found that quicker of better for my needs.

As for problem solving, and unique ways to do it I've always employed back to front thinking. Instead of trying to figure out how to get to what you want from the start, try working backwards from what you "need" to where you are now. I don't know how to explain it, it's always been the most natural way to solve problems for my neurodivergent brain, but it helps to really detach yourself from all the traditional ways you've done things, and come up with new ideas and methods never done before. If you keep following the same path forward, you'll most likely end up at the same destination. Give me a 2d maze puzzle to solve and I always start at the finish and can "see" the path back to the start, near instantly. Starting at the start, I can't see it, and just blindly follow every path forward until I get there.
I will need to give that a try.

MPGs are quite inexpensive about $10-15

7A1805DD-5D42-444F-88B0-04CDFB71036F.jpeg
 
I think thats because of the way the designers create them. If you take one of those puzzles and flip it, it won't be quite as easy. And if you think about what I just said, I believe that you will instantly see why.
Yeah, of course they're branched out like that. I know that.... The point wasn't literally the maze itself, but the methodology of solving problems working backward from the solution. Told ya, I can't explain it. It's just how my brain is wired. Reverse polarity or something....
 
Last edited:
I think thats because of the way the designers create them.
One of my assignments in Com Sci in university was to create a program in Pascal that had a graphical user interface. I chose to write a program that would create a uniquely solvable maze based on an algorithm I found in Byte magazine. It presented some interesting challenges but worked like a hot damn when it was done. It would draw a grid onscreen based on user input re: size, randomly select a starting edge & proceed to "erase" a path through the grid. Fun to watch. Programmed on a DEC Pro 350 connected to an IBM 360 mainframe back in '86 or '87.

Lotta water under the bridge since then.
 
Yeah, of course they're branched out like that. I know that.... The point wasn't literally the maze itself, but the methodology of solving problems working backward from the solution. Told ya, I can't explain it. It's just how my brain is wired. Reverse polarity or something....

LOL! My turn.....

I know you know that!

Hence the play on words.

I prefer not to think about your hat or your reverse polarity......

But I do like how you think!
 
Back
Top