I take that as a compliment.Looks pristine, definitely worthy of a you suck !
And since I'm a non-technical-background, self-taught guy, I refer to it frequently.Nice find. The bible is a great source of information, regardless of edition.
"Machinery" was the name of a print magazine, that catered to Machine and Metalworking related shops. They saw a use for gathering together a lot of varied, and sometimes hard to find Data sets, as a valuable resource for Machinists as well as other trades. Thus it became "Machinery's" (it belonged and was produced by them) Handbook. It is not a Plural, of Machinery, rather the possessive form.Am I the only one who has never been able to be comfy with the title of that book?
Machinery is already plural.
Machinery can't own something.
I would think "Machinery Handbook" would have been better.
GREAT FIND FOR A BUCK!
"Machinery" was the name of a print magazine, that catered to Machine and Metalworking related shops.
I told all the guys that thought that they 'needed' one, that it was NOT a How-To book, rather a collection of wall charts that could cover a decent sized gymnasium's walls...
"Machinery" was the name of a print magazine, that catered to Machine and Metalworking related shops.
I told all the guys that thought that they 'needed' one, that it was NOT a How-To book, rather a collection of wall charts that could cover a decent sized gymnasium's walls...
I kinda doubt it crossed very many people's minds at the time. Machinery was a specialized, but fairly widely distributed source of information, news of what developments were taking place, in industry, changes in machines and tooling that were rampant in that era, etc. Pretty well known.PERFECT explanation Trev! It actually makes sense now and it will never bother me again!
Thank you Sir!
I gotta wonder how many of the staff at Machinery Magazine laughed at the idea of people gagging on the name like I did?
It wasn't the only handbook. American Machinsts' Handbook written by Calvin & Stanley and published by McGraw Hill was another one.
In truth, I would posit, that the publishers thought that buying audience, only "barely" spoke English as they knew it. Being mostly Colonials or Rebels....There are quite a few. At least with that one, old geezers like me are not left wondering whether the author and publisher spoke English.