Doggggboy
Ultra Member
6.9 to 1kilopascal is in relation to PSI.
And I'll forget that before anyone even reads it.
6.9 to 1kilopascal is in relation to PSI.
LOL. Thx. Prolly not going to memorize that one.6.9 to 1
And I'll forget that before anyone even reads it.
LOL. Thx. Prolly not going to memorize that one.
Except the metric system is confusing. You jump from a centimetre right to a metre. I don't find metric to be logical at allMeh. I was in school while they tried to obliterate the Imperial measurements system. I was still in school, when News items were starting to point out that despite the Metric System supposedly being superior, they were having to teach Imperial Measurements to College and University students, so that they could understand stuff like that the majority of the prairies was surveyed out in 1 mile, by 2 mile grids, or that (ironically, since they are not actually) houses were built with 2x-dimensional lumber, and if you needed to repair those, you needed to understand the dimensional differences, between Metric and Imperial measure.
The only guys that can live without knowledge of legacy systems, are guys that have no responsibility to go back and fix what they screwed up, yesterday!
I got a call one night, about 1 in the morning, from a Farmer Friend that needed to know if I had a 17mm socket, He had NO Metric tools. Turned out the "special" bolts that GM used to secure his clutch to the flywheel in his "not Metric truck", were Metric...
Reality is, even the Inch, is defined in Law, as being 25.4mm. A pound of meat (a days ration, usually) is 454 grams, or near enough, half a Kilo. A Liter and a Quart are darn near enough to being equal too. As are the breakdowns, with 250 Ml ~= 1 cup. Etc.
A fella could do a lot worse than to simply shrug and get on with understanding both the Legacy systems AND the modern ones.
Well actually...Except the metric system is confusing. You jump from a centimetre right to a metre. I don't find metric to be logical at all
Metric is always odd numbers, too. It's always 37,500 kg or 2200 pounds per ton, the metric system, math wise, is weird
Reality is, even the Inch, is defined in Law, as being 25.4mm.
Well no, an imperial ton is 2000 pounds, so to me that's more logical than a metric tonne being 2200 pounds. That's why I say metric is never round numbers. Maybe if you stay working in metric it's ok but it's the converting to imperial that makes metric messy?Well actually...
It goes centimeter, then decimeter, then meter.
Metric is not odd numbers it is always even, that why it makes sense. It is based on powers of 10 and has standardized units.
1 metric tonne is 1000kg
2200 lbs in 1 tonne ....so maybe it's the imperial system that's always odd?
And I know there were thousands of acres of crop land burnt with weed sprayer miscalculations for a couple years after metric conversion
Did that book mention why the USA isn't metric? I don't know all the facts but there was a ship sailing from Europe with some metric standard rods, it either sank or was pirated, the standards were lost. So the USA stayed (mostly) imperial.I have a book "Beyond Measure" that was recommended by a forum member (I forget who) that reviews the history and function of modern metrology. It's a GREAT READ!
The inch has a very colourful history. Before international standardization, the inch varied slightly between different countries and even regions within countries. Historically, it had definitions based on things like three grains of barley, dry and round, placed end to end lengthwise, or the breadth of the King's thumb.
As the world changed because of the industrial revolution, trade and science demanded more precision. In 1791, Post Revolution France, eager to change the world, adopted the metric system and based the meter on one ten millionth of the distance along a meridian from the north pole to the equator passing through Paris.
Along the way, they decided to create a standard platinum-uridium bar, and in 1889, another better standard bar was created and stored in Paris that became the new meter relegating the polar distance to history.
Finally, they arbitrarily decided to standardize the meter as 1/299,792,458 of the speed of light in a vacuum in meters/second. This tied the meter to a physical constant of the universe. But still hardly a perfect number. Just an arbitrary one.
It is important to know that the British inch was also evolving to become more standard at the same time. And this is where is gets interesting. Proponents of the metric system like to say that the inch was arbitrarily defined as 2.54 centimeters. But proponents of the imperial system like to say that the cm is defined as 1/2.54 inches. And, since both can be arbitrarily defined in terms of the speed of light, it's actually better to just say that 1" = 2.54cm and not say that one is based on the other. Instead they are both based on the speed of light.
Of course, I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that the decimal system of 10s is not perfect. It requires all sorts of macinations to be described in digital terms. On the other hand, if our ancestors had left their thumbs out and only counted their fingers, we would all be using an octal base, and OCTAL ACTUALLY IS A PERFECT SYSTEM. One that requires no macinations! Both multiplication and division would be as simple as shifting digits. We could all do it in our heads!
The only downside is that I'd already be well over 100...... Octal 100 is decimal 64. So anyone over 64 is over 100 in Octal.
Now, about time........ What a frigging mess.....
Ya and it can get much more confusing and complicated than your scenario when you throw in actual active ingredients per acre with all of the above. The US gallon thing has always annoyed me.So a "typical" application is 10 or 15 or 20 US Gallons of water per acre mixed with 1 Litre per acre of Herbicide applied at 4 miles per hour using the right nozzle to apply the above rates in US Gallons per minute.
It's a Fk'ing mess. No wonder somebody torched a few acres.
Did that book mention why the USA isn't metric? I don't know all the facts but there was a ship sailing from Europe with some metric standard rods, it either sank or was pirated, the standards were lost. So the USA stayed (mostly) imperial.
Well the ship I'm referring to would've been around the same time you're referencing them making a metric standard, in the 17-1800'sIf it did. I don't remember it
What I do remember is that units of measure were state controlled back then.
That said, my boss was successful in convincing the entire auto industry in North America (US, Canada, and Mexico) to go metric. That's why all vehicles have metric fasteners today.
Well no, an imperial ton is 2000 pounds, so to me that's more logical than a metric tonne being 2200 pounds. That's why I say metric is never round numbers. Maybe if you stay working in metric it's ok but it's the converting to imperial that makes metric messy?