• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

Tool Cool inside mics

Tool
I've never seen inside mics like this. Can't vouch for them, but wondering what others think.

Screenshot_20241205_085027_AliExpress.jpg

 
Not sure what to think of that style. It appears from the picture that all 3 claws/feet are the same length. I don't think they will measure a dip/dent or other problem in a bore as the foot will bridge over it. The bore gages I have used in the past while having 3 feet, have the movable one much smaller, so it can at least not ride over most scores/dents etc.
They would likely be better then a nail and a wedge though. Mind you the nail and wedge does not need batteries.
 
I don't think they will measure a dip/dent or other problem in a bore as the foot will bridge over it.

I think they are mainly for nominal measurements and it would be difficult to use them to identify and measure anomalies.
 
very pricey for my budget.

I see analog old school used mics of same or similar style for a lot less at auction frequently. I keep meaning to buy a set because 3 points of contact is better than two.
 
A cylindrical grinder operator I worked with used them (analog type) in one shop I worked at to measure the bore holes for guide pins and bushings in die sets that we manufactured. Worked great for that application.
 
They work well for their intended purpose. The downside is cost, they are very expensive and have a small diameter range, therefore you need to have many different ones to cover a wide range of hole sizes. If you are doing production jobs where you are measuring one hole size all day the cost could be justified.
 
I've a bunch of Tesas like that, analogue not digital. We all know to read mics, but the digital would be nice as you could calibrate to a close to size setting ring for super accurate work. All three legs move and you engage a lot of the bore. If you goal is detecting irregularities, stick with a dial bore gauge. The Tesa's are very accurate and nice to use. You need a lot though as each has a small measuring range.

I've also a bunch the Mitutoyo digital ones, borematics (name always reminded me of Dan Akryods old SNL skit, the Bass-o-matic). Uber expensive and quite accurate, all three legs move out radially. They are spring loaded with a lever to actuate (vs a micrometer barrel) so are kind of fool proof. Don't use them as much as I'd like as I'm missing a few setting rings. Short of a high end CMM, they are nicest way to measure a bore imo.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top