• Spring 2024 meetup in Calgary - date Saturday, April 20/2024. discussion Please RSVP Here to confirm and get your invitation and the location details. RSVP NOW so organizers can plan to get sufficient food etc. It's Tomorrow Saturday! you can still RSVP until I stop checking my phone tomorrow More info and agenda
  • We are having email/registration problems again. Diagnosis is underway. New users sorry if you are having trouble getting registered. We are exploring different options to get registered. Contact the forum via another member or on facebook if you're stuck. Update -> we think it is fixed. Let us know if not.
  • Spring meet up in Ontario, April 6/2024. NEW LOCATION See Post #31 Discussion AND THE NEW LOCATION

chamfering machine

PeterT

Ultra Member
Premium Member
I guess I could call this Take-2. My first attempt was a V base I adapted onto a Makita variable speed trimmer router. The end of the cutter did the cutting, which was my preference. It worked but it had a few issues. It was kind of gangly to mount & not super safe to hold with one hand & push the work through with the other. The depth control used the stock ratchet wheel & clamp but it was kind coarse & hit & miss to adjust. The big concern was shavings were dropping through the cutter clearance hole & I figured the internals would get shorted.

So this one uses my Bosch die grinder in lay down mode. Unfortunately this model is not variable speed but seems to work OK. This has the cutting action on the side of the end mill. Die grinder vents are more protected than routers by design. But the firewall, base & 2 side members kind of make a natural confined box. 90% the chips stay drop down into there, nothing back to the motor. Goggles recommended.

To adjust the chamfer, I loosen the clamp handles, turn the knurled knob which jacks up the V frame up or down. The frame is confined by the UHMW slide rails. The base is 1/2" MDF. Rather than mount the base which was the plan I screwed on a keel from same material. Much easier to just hold it the bench vise. The test cuts look pretty good. Quite smooth & consistent. The aluminum tester is about .070", the steel is about .020". You can zip through the edges pretty quick & there is no kick back tendency, its quite controlled.

The V rails were designed around 3/16" thickness but whatever I was handed at MSM I discovered too late was undersize. I think it was offcut from sheet metal stamping vs. rolled steel. Anyway after filing & straightening it still looked like crap & was starting to rust. I gave it the Tremclad spray bomb treatment which in hindsight was probably dumb, its probably going to just scratch off. Maybe a piece of stainless or something? Anyway, the machine turned out ok. Its meant to do work, now time to move on.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0313_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_0313_edited-1.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_6557_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6557_edited-1.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_6558_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6558_edited-1.jpg
    43.3 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_6567_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6567_edited-1.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 23
  • IMG_6576_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6576_edited-1.jpg
    62.7 KB · Views: 23
  • IMG_6579_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6579_edited-1.jpg
    36.3 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_6580_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6580_edited-1.jpg
    32.3 KB · Views: 24
  • IMG_6582_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6582_edited-1.jpg
    39.1 KB · Views: 22

PeterT

Ultra Member
Premium Member
Construction pics. Mostly things went according to plan, but there were some fiddly operations at angles & few things I'd change in hindsight.

Milling accurate (deep) V notch faces that need to be positioned at a specific distance to an edge is a bit of a bugger I find. So I first spotted a hole which occurs at the V intersection point, inserted a dowel pin & then registered the end mill from that because the diameter is known. This only works if you don't need the sharp point of the V.

The V rail has a notch for the end mill, but that's angled too. I didn't want a lot of clearance there for the stock to trip on or expose the cutter more than necessary. Maybe I over-thunk this part. Anyway, some simple wood jigs to clamp it in the vise.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6499_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6499_edited-1.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_6512_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6512_edited-1.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_6513_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6513_edited-1.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_6505_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6505_edited-1.jpg
    45.3 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_6514_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6514_edited-1.jpg
    41.8 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_6515_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6515_edited-1.jpg
    48.5 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_6516_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6516_edited-1.jpg
    53.7 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_6517_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6517_edited-1.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_6519_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6519_edited-1.jpg
    36.7 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_6525_edited-1.jpg
    IMG_6525_edited-1.jpg
    35.7 KB · Views: 8

schor

Active Member
Good job. I want to make one but using the edges off the carbide cutters I never use.
 

PeterT

Ultra Member
Premium Member
I thought about inserts, but laziness set in :). This particular grinder only has a collet for 0.250" shank. So I would have had to machine a custom cutter head & neck it down to 0.250". That part is trivial, but even a smallish 1" diameter head means milling say 2 opposed faces, pockets & threaded holes (for the particular inserts I use). Because my grinder is not variable speed, a larger head would mean higher SFPM, probably way over what recommended range would be (at least for steel). I guess you could have a motor drive a shaft... more work. So, 0.250" straight shank multi flute carbide it was. They are razor sharp & actually leave a nice finish. Through this exercise I found there are actually not that many 0.250" shank cutting tools, most are 0.375" dia or metric. 6mm is pretty close but too sloppy in the collet.

I haven't seen the innards of these typical Taiwan industrial machines, but it says it uses SPU-422 inserts. Those go for $10 a pop & are single sided. Its just too much machine (and way too expensive) for my smaller sized cosmetics.
 

Attachments

  • SNAG-1-28-2018 0000.jpg
    SNAG-1-28-2018 0000.jpg
    46.3 KB · Views: 10
  • SNAG-1-28-2018 0001.jpg
    SNAG-1-28-2018 0001.jpg
    36.7 KB · Views: 7
Top