Search results

Yup, definitely different than my Accusize (year 2017). Interesting. @Don Sipes when did you get yours? I'm wondering if that this is their new 'standard'. The idea I was mentioning could go something like this. (Its actually the propeller drive washer assembly for my radial engine). A...

Well, maybe yes, maybe no. The 0.55 equates to the big end of typical taper when its machined. But eyeballing the nominal OD like around pulley ID looks larger & possibly around this size. But I agree, we are only guessing until it comes out. I still think a call to Accusize would be...

@Don Sipes I just had a dangerous thought. It might not be too far fetched based on what I've seen of my machine & heard of others. Is there any possibility your spindle that was pulled from Bin-A 'to be tapered' vs Bin-B 'finish tapered'? It would be worth a call to Accusize. If everything...

Good to see you persevered. The outcome does not surprise me, often a coin toss. Now we just need to get you set up on an insert style threading bar so you don't have to 'dedicate' your HSS blank. LOL

Seems like a common size format for Asia manufactured diamond & CBN wheels in nominal 100mm OD is 20mm ID bore. And from my experience the actual diameters can vary +/- The AO type wheels can vary, some have a nylon insert with 20mm bore, some are just the aggregate & different dimension again...

Get-R-Done haha Just curious is that a Taiwan type 935 mill?

I read a Catia perpetual license costs 14K + 2.5K annual maintenance, or annual term license of 5.6K. Probably USD. It would be like buying an F1 to get your groceries LOL. Dassault developed Catia & acquired Solidworks some time ago to compete in the, lets call it medium sized market...

@gerritv images not loading. Not sure if these in particular. Others in post seem to load ok, but I've noticed this behavior sporadically in other threads.

@David I believe so, probably sitting in a box of equally underwhelming parts. If you're asking is it worth buying I would say no. Most of my parts didn't even fit one another as intended, never mind another machine. The side rod is meant to engage a matching hole in the underlying dovetail...

Yup. I was actually being 'CAD-lazy'. This particular setup can be simulated in CAD with a bit of juggling because A) the cutting geometry = arc sweep of BH is fully defined B) the cut rotation axis = part turning on its axis which in his setup is 45-deg to spindle axis is also fully defined. So...