Tool Depth Micrometer - which one

[slow-poke]

I need to scratch this itch......

A few options, which one would you choose?

A)

Pardon Our Interruption...

B)

Pardon Our Interruption...

C)

Pardon Our Interruption...

D) or just get a 1"

Amazon.ca

 

[YotaBota]

The Starrett is an inside mic not a depth mic and it looks like there are a few empty rod spaces in the case.

Never heard of Lufkin but it's nicely packaged.

Don't know who makes the Shars mic but it looks complete.

If you go for the Amazon variety I would compare readings with a Starrett or Mit to check for accuracy and repeatability. Someone you know must have one they would be willing to bring over to do the testing with.

If it was between Amazon and Shars I think I would go with Shars, at least they are a known name.

 

[Susquatch]

I need to scratch this itch......

The lufkin in a wood box is nice. The starrett isn't a depth mic..

I'd get a real, Starrett or Mitutoyo since a caliper will do all of what these lesser units will do.

If you simply must have a real depth mic and don't want to shell out for a Starrett or a Mitutoyo, get an Accusize.

Accusize Industrial Tools 0-6'' Range x 4'' Base Depth Micrometer, 0.001'' Resolution, Including 6 Rods, 2025-4201 https://a.co/d/eVex494

 

[ChazzC]

Lufkin is a known brand and if older made in the U.S., better quality than SHARS. However, the SHARS is more than adequate.

I have a Craftsman 0 - 3” set and a “Japan Micrometer” (NSK) brand 0 - 4” set:

Photos:

Eventually, I will modify the Craftsman into a half-base:

 

[slow-poke]

Lufkin is a known brand and if older made in the U.S., better quality than SHARS. However, the SHARS is more than adequate.

I have a Craftsman 0 - 3” set and a “Japan Micrometer” (NSK) brand 0 - 4” set:

Photos:

View attachment 54125


Eventually, I will modify the Craftsman into a half-base:

View attachment 54127

I made an offer for the Lufkin, and the seller accepted, so now I just have to be patient.