• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

BusyBee tool -- what inserts?

trlvn

Ultra Member
Hi:

I bought a couple of lots in an auction this week. Included was a used set of BusyBee tool 3/8 inch holders:

BB lathe tools.jpg


I have zero experience with carbide tooling on my tiny Atlas 618 lathe. But I'm wondering about trying. If these holders are the same as the ones BusyBee currently sells (B1278), then they offer 3 inserts for $20:

https://www.busybeetools.com/products/carbide-insrt-c6-for-b1278-tin-coat-3pcs.html

If I wanted to buy elsewhere, how do I determine exactly which inserts to buy? Taking a rough measure on the existing inserts, I get 10.x mm long on each side and 3.0 mm thick:

BB insert length.jpg


BB insert thickness.jpg


A specific recommendation would be much appreciated.

Craig
 
I know the insert is called a TNMG. The size is measured by the inscribed circle. calculate the largest circle that fits inside the triangle and that will help you pick the right size.
 
Here is an ID chart that breaks down the parameters (although vendors can still vary a bit with their own lingo, coating, chip breaker, nose radius designations...).
http://www.mitsubishicarbide.com/en.../tec_turning_guide/tec_turning_identification

I would check out Ebay or AliExpress. That is a very common size & lots to choose from at lower cost. I cant imagine BB is stocking anything special.
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/400...chweb0_0,searchweb201602_2,searchweb201603_55

Thanks!

The inserts that you linked to on Aliexpress are: TNMG160404

G = zero relief angle? This seems to be common but I don't understand. Every HSS needs relief; why not carbide?

0404 = The first 04 is thickness. Does this mean I can choose the thickness? The existing inserts appear to by "03" which is 3.18 mm. "04" would be 4.76 mm which is quite a bit thicker.

The second 04 is tip radius. "04" means 0.4 mm radius. Is this a good general purpose radius for my tiny Atlas 618 lathe (with 1/2 HP motor)?

Thanks again,

Craig
 
Sorry Craig. I just inserted a random example just to illustrate price, not a specific recommendation. I remember flipping catalog pages on these triangle inserts before trying to find equivalent designations and it can be confusing. I don't use these particular ones myself, but similar issues regardless of inserts. Some parameters (like size) you have to get correct, others are more preference.
I'll try to point out a few things to get you going.

I think you are nominally T-C-M-T-11-03-08-F-N-MP. The 11 indicates 6.35 mm inscribed circle. The NAm? equivalent is when you see TCMT 21.5 like these.
If you look at the breakdown sheet, it lists all the corresponding parameters
https://www.traverscanada.com/terra...ndexable-carbide-turning-insert/p/22-100-132/

So sometimes entering 'TCMT 21.51' in the search bar will turn up lots of hits on NAm sites whereas TCMT 1103.. in offshore.
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/TCMT-Insert...396147?hash=item2acbf40ff3:g:YnAAAOSwMM1c2N3o
 

Attachments

  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0000.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0000.jpg
    93.4 KB · Views: 0
Using the designation chart just as an example, here is how the breakdown would work. And remember, other vendors or standards may have variations to this. So its just to get you going.
 

Attachments

  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0003.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0003.jpg
    75.4 KB · Views: 0
  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0002.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0002.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 0
  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0001.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0001.jpg
    148.8 KB · Views: 0
  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0004.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0004.jpg
    60.6 KB · Views: 0
  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0005.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0005.jpg
    90.5 KB · Views: 0
Note that your tool set has left hand, right hand & neutral tool holders. What I think most people do is use a neutral cutting direction (the 9th designation) as a jack-of-all-trades. But you can see where problems can arise. You get a smokin deal on 50 triangle inserts that happen to be left hand factory leftovers & you get strange cutting results wondering why.

You asked about nose radius. I tend to favor about 1/32" (0.8mm) or 3/64" (1.2mm) but it really depends. I do more aluminum & they hold up well with decent finish. In aluminum I also use smaller radius like 1/64 (0.4mm) good for sharp shoulders, bit less cutting force but a slightly duller finish & bit more more fragile. A wider radius like 1/16" (1.6mm) looks very shiny, takes a bit more power... & basically the tradeoffs go in the opposite direction. Dont confuse shiny with accurate, its a sequence of scallops under a microscope. You'll find whats right for your machine. Steel really isn't much different but you have to be careful about interrupted cuts & mill scale. Some people use their old tool on the first passes & save the inserts for actual cutting. Coatings & chipbreaker... its a rabbit hole & so dependent on what you are doing, speeds & feeds. I tend to buy whats cheap but in the ball park designation wise.

Yes I think its best to have back relief like the 7-deg example. I don't think you will find a lot of thickness variation once you get the other parameters fixed but just be aware if you replace an insert to re-check center.

Some of the toolholders have gone their own way on the insert fastener in terms of torx head & screw pitch. Just be aware. Whats important is the head angle. Most seem to work, just dont gronk on it.
 
Yes but on the Travers link you provided, see how you can see the ISO equivalent
 

Attachments

  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0006.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0006.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 0
Unrelated but to make life confusing I have seen very similar triangle inserts used on milling cutters. I never got along with them very well myself, but after experimenting with other variants & gradually improving results, I started to question if the (typically offshore) toolholder maker even knew what they were doing. They generally copycat 'real' tools, but sometimes they go off on a tangent or take shortcuts. Or they find a more obscure insert designation specifically so you have to go back to them to buy replacements. Again, nothing wrong with BB if you got a deal, but you can find those toolholders dirt cheap on Ali & Ebay.
 
Wow, what a can of worms!!

So I've checked the existing insert closely. Using my drill index, it most closely fits a 1/2 inch diameter hole so that makes it size "22". Also, the screw is tapered and the insert has a cutting face (+ chipbreaker) only on one side so that makes it a "T". Based on all the other postings (thanks everybody), I probably want:

TCMT220308 F-N-MP

I'll check Bangood and whatnot for some inserts to try out.

Thanks again,

Craig
 
Just to be clear, on the triangular inserts its the inscribed circle (IC). 6.35 mm (1/4") agrees very well with your 10-ish mm accross an edge
 

Attachments

  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0007.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0007.jpg
    2.9 KB · Views: 0
Drawing to verify. If by 1/2" you mean the insert would fit like like so. But the designation goes by (smaller) inscribed circle 6mm, not connecting the points with large circle (12.7mm = 0.5")
 

Attachments

  • SNAG-12-7-2019 0009.jpg
    SNAG-12-7-2019 0009.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 0
Drawing to verify. If by 1/2" you mean the insert would fit like like so. But the designation goes by (smaller) inscribed circle 6mm, not connecting the points with large circle (12.7mm = 0.5")
Aha! I had totally misinterpreted that!

Trying again, it appears to be a 1/4" inscribed circle (6.35 mm) which which would be size "11". However, when I search for TCMT11, there seem to be very limited choices. None, in fact, for TCMT110308.

My head hurts. Maybe I should just stick with grinding my own HSS.

Craig
 
Hey Craig,

refer to the site I posted before:

T= Triangle
C= 7° clearance
M= is the tollerance
T= tapered through hole

2= 1/4” inscribed circle
2= 1/8” thick
1= 1/64” radius on the cutter
 
Back
Top